WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



Buster 4:22 Mon Oct 5
Re: Wireless headphones
Seen a lot of people say Beats are shit. The Sennheisers get good reviews but they're not Bluetooth which is what I'm after.

Honest Hammer 12:17 Mon Oct 5
Re: Wireless headphones
Beats headphones have the audio quality of a pair of £25 Sony's. They are awful.

chim chim cha boo 11:54 Mon Oct 5
Re: Wireless headphones
I've got a Pioneer AV amp they plug into and there's music over everything I watch so there's not much difference between TV and pure music sources. I DO listen to music on them though and I'm a proper picky cunt when it comes to audio having worked in recording studios and video production.

Like I say though it's a personal choice. For instance, some people love the sound of Beats but I think they are too brash. I like a bit of subtlety sometimes. Most headphones seem very bass-heavy.

w4hammer 11:50 Mon Oct 5
Re: Wireless headphones
http://thegadgetflow.com/portfolio/earin/

Buster 11:48 Mon Oct 5
Re: Wireless headphones
chim, are the 180s primarily for TV, or are they perfectly fine for music as well? I wouln't use them for TV to be honest so I'm steering towards the Bose ones for that reason.

chim chim cha boo 11:45 Mon Oct 5
Re: Wireless headphones
I've got those Sennheiser-RS-180s primarily so I can watch the telly when the missus goes to bed and they sound absolutely lovely but their range is not brilliant.

I had a cheaper pair of Sennheisers before and they would work all over my not particularly big flat but with the RS180s there are a few dead-spots around my gaff where they drop signal. Like I say though, they sound lovely and if they broke I'd go out and buy them again as I use them virtually every night.

I've had a complete mare trying headphones for the gym though as I mostly watch films on my phone and headphones are seldom loud enough or pop out of my ears when I sweat. I must have tried 15 pairs including Jaybird Bluebuds which are Bluetooth and recommended by the American marathon running association (or someone) and they slip out of my ears too. Oh, and they sound shit.

The problem is that I've got a pair of Sure SE535s inner-earphones that were stupidly expensive but sound wonderful (once you get a good fit). I always end up going back to those and the gym has fucking knackered them. I'm currently using K Sound sports headphones that are nice and loud, don't fall out and cost eight quid.

I've made a short story long I know but the point is that headphones are a personal thing and the bastard is that you don't know you're going to get on with them until you buy them and don't get on with them.

i-Ron 11:44 Mon Oct 5
Re: Wireless headphones
I found beats headphones once. Right result. Apart from the fact they didn't fit my tiny ears properly and kept falling out because they're so weighty.

goose 11:37 Mon Oct 5
Re: Wireless headphones
i've got some beats wireless ones, they work great but they are massive. get the ones with the wire instead.

penners28 11:16 Mon Oct 5
Re: Wireless headphones
get some beats ones. then just hang them round your neck 24/7 to show how rich you are





Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: